Episode 35126 min
Macros vs Calories: Which Works Better for Women Over 40?
Chapters
In this episode
Calories matter. Nikkiey Stott is clear about that: energy balance is the foundation of fat loss, and simply paying attention to calories can be eye-opening. But if you've counted calories, watched the scale drop and still don't see the lean, toned body you were after, calories alone may not be giving you enough information. In this updated 2026 take on one of the show's most-shared episodes, Nikkiey explains why macro tracking isn't an alternative to calorie counting. It's the more complete version of it.
She walks through the example of two women eating 1,600 calories a day with very different results, and explains why protein is the deciding factor. Without enough protein, a deficit costs you muscle along with fat, and you end up a smaller version of the same shape. She shares her protein starting point of 0.8 to 1 gram per pound of body weight, based on goal weight if you have a lot to lose. She also takes on the 'protein' marketing on processed foods like protein Pop-Tarts.
Nikkiey is honest that macro tracking has a learning curve, and she explains when starting with calories makes sense. She lays out exactly where to begin: build your meals around a daily protein target, get consistent with it for a few weeks, then look at total calories, carbs and fats. Her summary in one line: calories tell you how much, macros tell you what.
Key takeaways
- Macro tracking always includes calorie tracking, because both come from the same data, so it is the more complete version rather than an alternative.
- When tracking macros, aim to land within plus or minus five grams of each target for protein, carbs and fat.
- Two women eating the same 1,600 calories can get very different results, and the one eating high protein keeps more muscle and looks more toned and defined.
- Without enough protein, a calorie deficit burns muscle along with fat, which leaves you a smaller, skinny-fat version of the same body shape.
- If you are new to tracking, focus only on your daily protein target, about 0.8 to 1 gram per pound of body weight, using your goal weight if you have a lot to lose.
- Don't trust the word 'protein' on processed food labels; Nikkiey points to protein Pop-Tarts as an example of marketing that doesn't deliver real protein.
- If macros feel overwhelming, starting with calories is a valid first step to build the logging habit before layering in macro awareness.
- Track honestly and consistently, including weekends, rather than perfectly, so your data actually reflects your reality.
Questions answered
What is the difference between counting calories and tracking macros?
Calorie counting tracks the total number of calories you eat against a daily target. Macro tracking goes a layer deeper and tracks the protein, carbs and fat that make up those calories. Because it includes calories, Nikkiey calls it the more complete version, not an alternative.
Can you lose weight just by counting calories?
Yes. Nikkiey says energy balance is a foundational principle, and eating consistently less than you burn leads to weight loss. Her point is that calories alone don't show whether that weight is fat or muscle, which decides how your body ends up looking.
How much protein should I eat to lose fat?
Nikkiey's starting point for a fat loss phase is 0.8 to 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight per day. If you weigh much more than your goal, for example 250 pounds, she suggests basing it on your goal weight, so around 180 grams is a good starting point.
Why am I losing weight but not looking toned?
Nikkiey explains that when you cut calories without enough protein, you lose a mix of fat and muscle. The result is a smaller version of the same body shape, which she calls skinny fat, rather than a more toned and defined one.
Is macro tracking too complicated for beginners?
Nikkiey admits it has a steeper learning curve up front, with three numbers instead of one. She says most women who stick with it for a couple of months find it becomes second nature. If it feels overwhelming, starting with calories to build the habit is a valid first step.
Where should I start if I want to change my body composition?
Start with protein. Figure out your daily protein target and build your meals around hitting it, which can take a few weeks to do consistently. Once protein is consistent every day, not just Monday through Thursday, start paying attention to total calories, carbs and fats.
Full transcript
Nikkiey: Calories do matter. 100%, calories matter. Energy balance, the real relationship between the energy that you take in and the energy that you burn, is a real, documented, foundational principle of fat loss. Period. If you are consistently eating more than your body burns, you will gain weight. If you are consistently eating less, you will lose. That is not up for debate. Science, point blank. It's like nutrition 101 knowledge. But here's where calorie counting alone falls short. And this is the part that I think changes everything for women specifically.
What's going on, everyone? Hey, you guys. Welcome back to another episode of The WarriorBabe Show. Or if this is one of your first episodes, welcome to the show, my friends. On these episodes, we talk about mindset, methodologies, and tactics that will help you lose body fat, build muscle, be strong, and feel insanely confident. I am your host, Nikkiey Stott, and welcome to today's episode, episode number 351. As I keep creeping up in these episode numbers, it gets hard to keep track of. Every single time I go and record an episode, I have to look back at the last number that went live. And since I'm a few out now, I have to then count. And it just gets harder and harder. Anyway, rant.
So today's episode is an episode that came out in January of 2023. And it has been one of the most listened to, most shared, most talked about episodes that we've ever put out. Which tells me that there's really something important in this episode that we're going to talk about today. And it's the question between macros or calories. Which one actually works? Which one actually matters? That's the one that women keep coming back to. And I think it's because the industry just keeps giving confusing, conflicting, contradictory answers and information. And that's just welcome to the space of the fitness industry. That is what it does so well: confusing people, thinking that one way is this way. And then your friend's doing this. There's just so much information out there.
What I hope of this episode, and what I hope that we bring to WarriorBabe, is that we just cut through that noise and we're able to give you guys some clarity. So here's what we're doing today. Coming back to this episode that we talked about three years ago, I'm coming back with more data. I'm coming back with more client results. I'm coming back with more industry context, the right industry context, the ones that cut through the BS. And honestly, in my opinion, I feel like a more refined approach and perspective than maybe when I first recorded this episode.
So whether you listened to this episode back in the day or you're brand new here, again, like I said, welcome. I hope this episode gives you everything that you need to understand which approach is right for your body and your goals. All right, so let's get into it.
Before we actually get into which approach wins, let's make sure that we're talking about the same things here, because I think a lot of the confusion in this conversation comes from people comparing apples to oranges. Calorie counting is exactly what it sounds like. You set a daily calorie target. You track the total number of calories that you eat and you try to stay within that number. The logic is simple: eat less than you burn, you lose weight at the end.
Macro tracking goes a layer deeper. Instead of just tracking total calories, you track the specific breakdown of protein, carbohydrates, and fat that make up those calories. I think I did an episode a week or so ago talking about macros 101, and we talked about all of this, right? You have individual targets for each of those macros, and you're working to hit all three of them, not just an overall calorie number. And when you do focus on macro tracking, the goal is to be plus or minus five in each one of those categories. So if your protein target is 150, you can be 145 or 155 on the day, plus or minus five. If your carbs are 230, you can be 225 or 235, plus or minus five, right? Same goes for fats.
Here's the important technical clarification to make. Macro tracking always includes calorie tracking, because when you know your macros, then interchangeably you know your calories. They're calculated from the same exact data. So macro tracking is not the alternative to calorie tracking. Think about it like this: it's just the more complete version of it.
So as we dive deeper, the real question isn't macros versus calories. The real question is: is total calorie intake enough information to get you the results that you want? Or do you need more information to get you the results that you want? And that's where everything gets interesting, from that frame of reference.
Think about it. Let me just ask you that again. The question is, is total calorie intake enough information? Because there are some babes listening to this, some women listening to this, that solely track calories, look at menus that list calories, and work toward a total calorie number. Has that gotten you to where you want to be? You probably lost weight from it. But has it gotten you to the real results that you want, which for the majority of listeners is to be more defined, more lean, more toned, more fit looking, right? So is total calorie intake enough information to get to the results you want? Or do you need more?
So let me address the calorie counting argument first, because it does have merit and I want to be fair about it. Calories do matter. 100%, calories matter. Energy balance, the real relationship between the energy that you take in and the energy that you burn, is a real, documented, foundational principle of fat loss. Period. If you are consistently eating more than your body burns, you will gain weight. If you are consistently eating less, you will lose. That is not up for debate. Science, point blank. It's like nutrition 101 knowledge.
And for some people, simply becoming aware of their calorie intake is genuinely transformative. It helps in so many ways. If you've never tried anything before and you start paying attention to your total calorie intake, you will probably learn things about your eating habits that will surprise you, and it will bring tons more awareness. And awareness alone can produce incredible results. So I'm not here to tell you that calories don't matter. They do. But here's where calorie counting alone falls short. And this is the part that I think changes everything for women specifically.
Two women, same calories, completely different results. I've said this numerous times. And the reason why I say this numerous times is because maybe the last time I said it, it didn't resonate with you 110%. Maybe today it's going to land differently.
Woman A eats 1,600 calories a day. Mostly processed carbs, minimal protein, moderate fat. She's in a deficit. By calorie math, she should be losing fat. Woman B eats 1,600 calories a day. High protein, moderate carbs, moderate fat. Also in a deficit. Over 12 weeks, Woman B loses significantly more body fat. She retains way more muscle. She has better energy. She's sleeping better, has stronger workouts, and is recovering better. Her body actually looks different. It's more toned. It's more defined.
Same calories, completely different body composition outcomes. Because the composition of those calories, where they came from and what the body was able to do with them, was entirely different. Calorie counting has no way to capture that difference. It sees 1,600 calories and calls it a day. Macro tracking sees what those 1,600 calories are actually made up of. And that's the information that changes the results.
This is the heart of the whole argument, and it's the thing that I wish I had explained more clearly back in early episodes. Protein is the single macronutrient that most dramatically changes what fat loss looks like. Not just whether you lose weight, but what the weight loss is actually composed of. And this distinction is literally everything. You've heard me say over and over and over again how important protein is. It is the king of the macronutrients, above the other two, carbs and fats.
When you lose weight without adequate protein, your body doesn't just burn fat. It burns muscle too. And losing muscle is the worst outcome in a fat loss phase, because muscle is what gives your body the shape that you are all after. It's what gives your body the definition, the toned look that almost every single woman I have a conversation with tells me she wants.
On top of that, muscle is also what keeps your metabolism elevated long term. Muscle is metabolically active tissue. Think about it as a parallel controller of your metabolism. Your metabolism doesn't shut off. Your metabolism keeps going. It keeps revving. It's a 24/7 engine. It's the same thing with your muscle tissue. Muscle tissue is metabolically active. It's constantly needing energy and fuel. It burns calories even while I'm sitting here, while I'm sleeping, while I'm sitting on the couch. I'm constantly burning calories. That alone should make me say, I want more muscle, because I want to burn calories while I'm just sitting watching TV, right?
So when you restrict calories without tracking your protein, you might see the scale go down, but you're likely losing a mixture of fat and a mixture of muscle. And that result just becomes a smaller version of the same body shape. That skinny fat. Not a transformed one, not one that has muscle, not one that has tone. It just has less of everything. And that's what every single diet out there does.
Ladies, are you feeling frustrated with body changes you're experiencing during menopause? It's time to take control. If you're between 45 and 65 years old and tired of struggling with body fat and muscle loss, WarriorBabe is here for you. At WarriorBabe, we've helped over 18,000 women just like you lose body fat, build toned muscle, and understand their bodies better with personalized plans based on hormone and thyroid testing and more. Imagine knowing exactly what your body needs to see real results, and results that last. Don't wait anymore. Take charge of your health and join our community of strong, empowered women. Visit warriorbabe.com/apply today to start your transformation. That's warriorbabe.com/apply. All right, let's get back to the show.
And this is where we get crazy, y'all. Just on a side rant here. I think I talked about this in an episode, or maybe it was just me having these conversations with people every day. Our pastor a couple of weeks ago brought up a topic about one of the most commonly used words in food marketing nowadays, and that's protein. So much so that now there are protein Pop-Tarts. For those of you that aren't watching and are on audio right now, I'm covering my head, my eyes. This is just a depressing moment. Protein Pop-Tarts.
So someone who is naive to this type of knowledge, or doesn't know it well enough, just sees 'protein' and thinks, oh my god, protein, amazing, incredible. That means I'm going to get more protein in my diet if I have protein Pop-Tarts. There is nothing healthy about that. And when you actually look at the grams of protein, I think it's 10 grams between the two, or 10 grams in one. That's not protein. Okay? That just drives me nuts. I'm just roping it back to the composition of what foods are made up of. Whole foods, not processed foods, are going to get you the results that you want in a healthier manner.
Anyway, hey, while you're listening, if you're getting value from this episode, take a moment to tap that review button or share this podcast with a friend. It's a small gesture that goes a long way in helping more women find their way to feeling stronger and more confident in their skin. I appreciate you so much for taking the time to support this show.
Going back to the skinny fat talk: if you are restricting your calories and you're not tracking your protein, then yes, you're going to see the scale go down, but you're going to lose a little bit of everything. You're going to lose fat and muscle, and you're going to look like a skinny fat version of yourself. That's not what you wanted, right? That's what I deem skinny fat. The look doesn't change the way that you hoped it would. The energy is low. Your metabolism is slower than before. And you have no idea why, because you were in a quote-unquote deficit the whole time.
So macro tracking, specifically setting a high protein target with good quality foods, will protect that muscle. Think of protein and muscle as working hand in hand together. They're a team. When you are in a deficit, that protein is going to protect that muscle while you lose the fat. This is the fundamental difference between losing weight and actually changing your body composition. And you cannot guarantee that outcome by tracking calories alone, because calorie tracking gives you no visibility into whether you're eating enough protein.
So the single most important number is, what do you think I'm going to say? I've said this before in episodes, whether I'm directly talking about macro tracking and calorie tracking or talking about the importance of protein. The single most important number in your tracking is your daily protein target. Not your total calories, not your carbs, not your fat. Your protein. If you can get that in religiously and consistently, then everything else just becomes way more manageable. If you are just setting out on your journey and stepping into the world of tracking, this is the only macronutrient that I want you to pay attention to. And I'm literally saying this: if you just pay attention to that, you will see some type of change in a matter of weeks.
And for those of you wondering, okay, how much protein do I need? Typically, for anyone in a fat loss phase, that looks like somewhere between 0.8 and 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight per day. That number is your foundation. Everything else gets built around that. So if you weigh 150 pounds, you're eating 150 grams of protein. Now, I always say this: if you weigh 250 pounds, I don't tell you to eat 250 grams of protein. I would ask, what's the goal weight that you're working towards? Let's eat for that. So 180 is probably a good starting point. 180 grams of protein in a day, even if you weigh 250.
I want to talk about the real-life side of this too, because the best approach is always the one you can actually sustain and actually start implementing. Because I hear this a lot. I hear, quote-unquote, macro tracking is so complicated. It sounds so complicated. Calorie tracking is just so much simpler. Can I just do that? Can I just count my calories? And to be honest with you, I think this objection deserves a real answer rather than just, no, do macros.
Yes, calorie counting is simpler to start. There's one number. You stay under it, done. But here's what I've seen happen with calorie-only tracking over and over and over again. Women hit a wall. They lose some weight initially, and then it stops working. Then their hunger becomes unmanageable. Then their energy tanks. Their workouts start to suffer. They start feeling like they're pushing through every single day just to stay in their deficit. And because they don't have protein data to look at, they don't know why. So they just assume that they need to eat even less.
This spiral is so brutal. And I've joked about this in episodes before. Actually, not joked, it's real. It's almost always a protein problem. There's a protein epidemic in the fitness space. Women are not eating enough protein.
Macro tracking has a slightly higher learning curve. Yes. I will be the one to tell you honestly and directly: macro tracking is not easy up front. It has a very high learning curve up front. You have three numbers instead of one. You need to think about your meals a little more intentionally. But here's what happens when women do it consistently for even just a few weeks. They're fuller. Their energy becomes more stable. Their cravings become more manageable. Their workouts start to feel so much better. They're recovering faster. They're sleeping soundly through the night. They start to see actual body composition changes, not just the number moving on the scale.
The short-term simplicity of calorie counting tends to produce short-term results. The slightly higher investment that you put into macro tracking tends to produce the results that actually last. That is why, until different science comes out, I will speak this until I'm blue in the face and maybe on my deathbed: macronutrients are the way to get to where you need to be with your results and your body.
And for what it's worth, macro tracking becomes a habit very, very quickly. Most women who've been doing it for a couple of months tell me that it becomes second nature. And for me, being 10 years into it, it's just a part of my life. It takes three minutes or even less, sometimes a minute, to track my day. And now, because I'm so confident with what food is and what it looks like and portion sizes, sometimes I don't even need to track. I can just pay attention to the first half of my day and balanced meals, and then dinner can just be high protein and whatever carbs and fats.
A lot of women who do this find it becomes second nature. They're not obsessing over it. They're just building their meals around their protein target and filling in the rest. It stops feeling like a math problem and at some point actually starts feeling like a strategy. So yes, there's going to be a learning curve. I'll tell you point blank. But do you want to stay where you are right now for the rest of your life and not try to figure out something that's actually sustainable and works long term?
If you do want to figure out something that works long term, you're going to have to change something. You're going to have to get invested in something. You're going to have to understand there's a learning curve. It's like anything in life. It's like learning a new job, becoming a mom, soccer practice and working that into your schedule. Same thing. There are learning curves in life. If you want to take this seriously, take your health seriously, and take the results you want to see with your body seriously, this is the answer.
Now, maybe there's a balance here, because there are situations where starting with calories makes sense, and I don't want to dismiss that. If you've never tracked anything before and the idea of macros feels completely overwhelming, starting with calories is a totally valid first step. Getting comfortable with logging your food, understanding your portion sizes, building the tracking habit. Yes, 1,000%. That foundation matters. And then you can layer in macro awareness once the habit is established.
If you're in a maintenance phase and your primary goal is simply to not gain weight, rather than actively changing your body composition, calorie awareness may be all you need on a day-to-day basis. And if you've been tracking macros for a long time and you've developed a strong intuitive sense of your food, stepping back from that detailed tracking and using a rough calorie awareness is also a great check-in tool. That can work well for a lot of the women I see who have been doing this for years. They can step back, and they've earned that right.
People who say they intuitively track and they're two years into their journey, I'm like, what does that even mean? You can't earn the right to intuitively track until you've done this for years and you've got the tracking habit down first. If it's 'I eat intuitively and I eat healthy' and you're not walking around with a rocking body, I don't buy what you're saying. You're not intuitively eating successfully. You don't earn that right until you've done this for a couple of years. Anyway, just to be direct and lean into that.
So if you came to me and said, Nikkiey, I want to change my body composition, where do I start? Here's exactly what I would tell you. Start with protein. Before you worry about your total calories, before you stress about your carb-to-fat ratio, before you do anything else, figure out your daily protein target and start building your meals around hitting it.
And this is going to take time. You aren't going to do this overnight. You need to develop that habit. This is where I want to get real with you. Some of you want results that happened yesterday. Implementing this step is something that takes a week, three weeks, to hit that target consistently. Then once you hit it consistently, and I mean genuinely consistent, not just Monday through Thursday, you can start paying attention to your overall calorie intake and where your carbs and fats are landing.
And don't try to be perfect from day one. Be honest with yourself. Track what you're actually eating first. See where you're at, and then adjust from there. Use an app. Weigh your food when you can. Log everything. Be consistent, not just on the weekdays. The women who get the best results with macro tracking are not the ones who track perfectly. They're the ones who track honestly and consistently enough that their data actually reflects their reality. That's what gives them something to actually work with. All right?
So with this episode, there's a lot of information that maybe you've heard me say in previous episodes, or that has been updated since the last time I did this. This is the 2026 version of the macro tracking versus calorie tracking conversation. And if I had to summarize the whole thing in one sentence: calories tell you how much, macros tell you what. And for body composition, the what matters so much more.
Okay, my friends. If this episode was helpful and you want to keep diving into this stuff, nutrition, training, mindset, all of it, come join us inside the free WarriorBabe community. It's a free Facebook group. We've got weekly calls that are free, weekly challenges that are free where you win stuff, and a full room of women who are in the same exact season of life as you are, asking the same questions, doing the same work, and showing up for each other. That link is in the show notes below. Come join us. Come on into the crew.
And if you have a friend who's been going back and forth on this calories versus macros question, and she's wondering the same things you were wondering before this episode, share this episode and send it to her. Maybe this is exactly the conversation she needs to hear. All right, my friends, I love you all, and I will see you in the next episode. Peace out.
Real quick, if this episode resonated with you or gave you the push that you needed, I'd love for you to pay it forward. Drop a quick rating and review, share the podcast with someone who might need it, and help me keep spreading the word. Your feedback not only helps the show grow, but it might just be the nudge someone else needs to kickstart their transformation. Thank you so, so much for your support.
Listen next
All episodes →Calories vs Macros: What Women Over 40 Need to Know
Episode 303 · Oct 17, 2025
Why Eating More Helps You Lose Fat After 40
Episode 272 · Jun 30, 2025
Macros vs Calories: Which Is Better for Fat Loss?
Episode 77 · Jul 7, 2023
Free Body Transformation Assessment
It's not you. It's your plan.
You've cut calories, done the cardio and tried the diets, and your body still won't budge. After 40, it needs a different approach. Tell us where you're stuck and we'll show you what to change.
- Built for perimenopause and menopause
- Eat more, not less, and still lose fat
- Strength training that fits real life
21,800+ women transformed
Free Body
Transformation Assessment